JUNE 23, 2016


In Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, 136 S. Ct. 2159 (2016), Dollar General Corp. (DGC) had a lease & license from the tribe to operate a store on tribal land. In 2003, a 13-year-old tribal member working at the store under a joint tribal-DGC internship alleged sexual abuse by the store manager and, in 2005, sued the store manager & DGC in the tribal court. Defendants claimed that the tribal court did not have jurisdiction over non-Indians. When the tribal court refused to dismiss the suit and the Choctaw Supreme Court affirmed, the defendants sued the tribe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to stop the suit. After the district court held that DGC’s consensual relationship with the tribe subjected it to tribal jurisdiction and the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court decision, DGC appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The then 8-member Court (Justice Scalia had died) split 4-4, letting stand the Fifth Circuit decision, albeit with no precedential value.

Source: Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Oyez.  Retrieved 11/27/2021, Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians | Oyez
Graphic:  Official Seal of U.S. Supreme Court.  Public Domain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: